Zafar,

My concern is that any load balancing tool might hash on the field where
you have the O-bit, if it does OAM traffic and normal payload traffic
will take different paths through the network.

How do you guarantee  this this will not happen?

/Loa

On 2018-05-29 19:11, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Hi Loa,

Thanks for your question.

O-bit "move" from SRH draft to this SRv6 OAM draft is part of a comment received an agreement made during the LC of the SRH draft. Please review the mail chain https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg30131.html. There was never a suggestion or agreement to "remove" O-bit or SRH.Flags field.

Load balancing and ECMP in an SRv6 network are explained in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-13#section-4.4. An implementation is expected to use the minimum of (source, dest) address and flow label in the outer IPv6 header to compute the hash. RFC6437 describes the use of flow labels to compute a hash for IPv6 packets.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

*From: *Loa Andersson <[email protected]>
*Date: *Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 9:48 AM
*To: *Huzhibo <[email protected]>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Cc: *Lizhenbin <[email protected]>, Yangang <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [spring] About draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00

Folks,

I thought we had an agreement to remove the O-bit. As ZhiBo Hu points

out other drafts drops it.

The obvious reason to not use an O-bit is that if it ever is part of

what an multipath functions hash on it will csue OAM traffic and

"normal" traffic to use different paths. This defeats the idea with

OAM traffic.

/Loa

On 2018-05-16 06:56, Huzhibo wrote:

    Hi,

    draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 says The OAM packets are identified by

    setting the O-bit in SRH,But I Notice the latest

    I-D.6man-segment-routing-headerhas removed O-bit in the SRH extension

    header. I want to confirm that draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 will also

    remove o-bit or keep the o-bit in the later version?

    Ths

    ZhiBo Hu

    _______________________________________________

    spring mailing list

    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

--

Loa Andersson                        email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Senior MPLS Expert

Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring


--


Loa Andersson                        email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to