Hi Rob,

It would be helpful, while updating the charter, to state whether multicast in 
SR is in/out of scope in order to know which wg to take our future work.

Thanks,
mike

From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 9:12 AM
To: Xiejingrong <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter

Hi Jingrong,
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 7:44 PM Xiejingrong 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Will SPRING consider multicast/BIER being included ? These are some reasons I 
am thinking about:
(1) multicast/multipoint-transfer is always a requirement for internet service, 
and is always requiring some unicast technology as a precursor.
(2) there is already a similar WG BIER to considering the similar stateless 
solution for multicast for long-term.
(3) there is already some consideration about multipoint SR in 
segment-routing-policy draft for a long time.
(4) there is already some consideration about combining BIER and SR in 
bier-6man-encapsulation draft.
(5) it had been mentioned in ietf101 London to consider cooperating with BIER 
for some purpose.

robjs> IMHO, if BIER leverages SR work this should be in liaison with SPRING, 
but I do not expect there to be any BIER related work in SPRING itself. If this 
needs changes to dataplanes, then the relevnat working group (mpls, or 6man) 
should be involved too.

robjs> It is my personal opinion that the SR-TE policy draft needs to be a 
constrained set of problems. It had become a collect-your-use-case document. 
Part of the ask of breaking the document down is so that we can produce a 
clear, succinct set of documents. Until such time as there are concrete 
proposals on multicast in SR that SPRING needs to consider (i.e., require a new 
functional specification, ratheror architectural extension) then I would aim to 
err on the side of keeping the charter clear, rather than collecting all 
possible use cases in it.

robjs> Please disagree with me if there is a benefit to having this in the 
charter that I'm missing.

Thanks,
r.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to