Rob,
Two things
- do we have an available current state of the charter-to-bu-updated
text.
- inline plz
On 2018-06-04 18:44, Rob Shakir wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for the comment.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:42 AM Michael McBride
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It would be helpful, while updating the charter, to state whether
multicast in SR is in/out of scope in order to know which wg to take
our future work.
I think this is impractical.
Yes, I agree that it is impractical have "everything" out of scope
listed. However for things being brought up for discussion we need
clear decisions/consensus documented on the mailing list.
Does your statement mean that "multicast in SR" is out of scope for
SPRING?
/Loa
If we state everything that is in or out of
scope, we'll end up with a laundry list. The aim of the charter is to
define clearly the work that the WG should focus on. It does not mean
that we can never host discussion of individual drafts if they are
relevant. If there are requirements, we can always recharter if
something new becomes the highest priority for the industry w.r.t SR.
Kind regards,
r.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
Loa Andersson email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
