Hi Stewart,

Nope that would be incorrect assumption.

Replication anchors would be where topologically it makes sense. And there
may not be at all any multicast trees those subject flows would need to
traverse. It is just about efficiency in content distribution.

Regards,
R.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bry...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> For clarification:
>
> Can I assume that we are talking about replication at ingress to a series
> of  unicast SR paths each to an installed multicast tree close to egress?
>
> - Stewart
>
> On 10/06/2018 10:58, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
> Hey Sasha,
>
> 100% agree with your last post. Very glad to see your support for
> spray/fan-out or if you will
> static MDTs to be in scope of SPRING.
>
> Based on number of WG members input expressed both at the meeting and on
> the list  I hope
> proposed SPRING charter will be updated soon to reflect that.
>
> Cheers,
> R.
>
> ​PS. Btw - I am also ok that ingress replication is not relevant to SPRING
> as it essentially happens at the
> ingress to the domain. ​
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Alexander Vainshtein <
> alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com> wrote:
>
>> Robert,
>>
>> First of all, I did not say that your quote was inaccurate. I apologize
>> for possible misperception.
>>
>>
>>
>> Second, I believe that spray or fan-out (meaning support of externally
>> computed static MDTs) in SR-MPLS is a relevant focus area for the future WG
>> work. Of course the solution must be aligned with the SPRING and MPLS
>> architecture, and this imposes additional restrictions on how such a
>> solution would look.
>>
>>
>>
>> Last but not least, I have differentiated (from my first email on this
>> thread) *ingress replication* *in SR* from the more generic *multicast
>> support *in SR:
>>
>> -          The latter is quite acceptable to me
>>
>> -          The former, IMHO, should be left out of scope.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope this helps to clarify my position.
>>
>> Regards, and, again, apologies for possible misinterpretation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sasha
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing listspring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to