Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not sure if informational status wouldn't be more applicable to this doc but I also fine with Proposed Standard. nits: 1) In sec 3.1.1 I assume "neighbor" and not "neighbot" is meant... 2) In sec 3.2 this could probably be an upper case MAY: "Multiple SRMSs may be present in the same network (for redundancy)." _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
