Not my ballot thread, but ... On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:29 AM Mirja Kühlewind <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm not sure if informational status wouldn't be more applicable to this > doc > but I also fine with Proposed Standard. > > nits: > 1) In sec 3.1.1 I assume "neighbor" and not "neighbot" is meant... > This is either the best typo or the best portmanteau(*) I've seen on an IESG evaluation ballot in the last five years. I look forward to finding out whether it's intentional! Spencer (*) If it is a portmanteau, it's well worthy of inclusion in https://www.vappingo.com/word-blog/86-great-examples-of-portmanteau/. 2) In sec 3.2 this could probably be an upper case MAY: > "Multiple SRMSs may be present in the same network (for redundancy)." > > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
