Hi Stewart, Thanks for your comments.
There is a companion draft where this TLV is defined. We can add reference/text to indicate this. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-rfc6374-srpm-udp-00#section-3.2.3.1 Hope this answers your question. Thanks, Rakesh On 2019-02-14, 9:43 AM, "spring on behalf of Stewart Bryant" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I am not quite sure what it means to do a two way path measurement in MPLS SR since MPLS SR defines a per packet unidirectional path. However, assuming that this makes sense, I don't see how the return path information is carried in the RFC6374 message. The draft does not ask IANA for any new types. Now it has been a long time since we wrote RFC6374, but I don't remember the design having the capability you require. Please could clarify how the return path operates in an MPLS SR environment? Best Regards - Stewart _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
