Hi Rakesh
Yes, that reference would be useful.
- Stewart
On 22/02/2019 22:37, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote:
Hi Stewart,
Thanks for your comments.
There is a companion draft where this TLV is defined. We can add reference/text
to indicate this.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-rfc6374-srpm-udp-00#section-3.2.3.1
Hope this answers your question.
Thanks,
Rakesh
On 2019-02-14, 9:43 AM, "spring on behalf of Stewart Bryant"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
I am not quite sure what it means to do a two way path measurement in
MPLS SR since MPLS SR defines a per packet unidirectional path. However,
assuming that this makes sense, I don't see how the return path
information is carried in the RFC6374 message. The draft does not ask
IANA for any new types. Now it has been a long time since we wrote
RFC6374, but I don't remember the design having the capability you require.
Please could clarify how the return path operates in an MPLS SR environment?
Best Regards
- Stewart
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
