Hi Rajiv, Many thanks for your comments. We will incorporate the suggestion in the next revision of the document along the lines of “synthetic probes messages congruent to the data traffic”.
Thanks, Rakesh On 2019-03-28, 3:17 PM, "ippm on behalf of Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Hi Rakesh, It is a useful draft. Simplifies TWAMP usage in SR networks. Given that the draft defines dedicated probes and response messages to measure PM/DM/LM, please consider not using the term Inband, as it would mean mucking up the user packets like specified in IOAM. Cheers, Rajiv _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
