Hi Loa, On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:42 AM Loa Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rajesh, > > It seems to me that "it is recommended" indicate that the ordering is > optional/OPTIONAL. Indeed. There is no MUST there. That is precisely what section 4.1 of RFC8200 says: 4.1 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8200#section-4.1>. Extension Header Order When more than one extension header is used in the same packet, it is * recommended *that those headers appear in the following order: Does this document (or your comment) create a > MANDATORY ordering of EH's?? > If by "this document" you mean draft-ali-6man-spring-srv6-oam then no - I do not see any text there which would even attempt to enforce any EH ordering. As far as creating MANDATORY ordering "by a comment" that must be pretty new extension to the IETF process :) Best, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
