Hi, I remember there had been lots of discussions on the list about two points, One is the definition of ENH, the other is the use of Next Header 59. Seems like this rev doesn't accept any of them, but make them clear in text.. They work for me.
But one point I am even more confused: The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior numbers are maintained by the working group until the RFC is published. Note to the RFC Editor: Remove this paragraph before publication. Why does this document say to create a new registry, but hold the Behavior numbers privately ? We need the IANA registry be created and allocation from the registry. Thanks Jingrong
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
