Hi Jingrong, The behaviours numbers are not hold privately: they are hold by the working group until the RFC is published and therefore the new IANA registry is created. After that, the registry is maintained by IANA with the registration procedure described in the draft.
If the paragraph in the draft is not clear, please feel free to propose a new one. Note that Loa and Shuping particularly asked to clarify this. In Prague I met with them and we updated the following: * SRv6 Endpoint Behavior sub-registry; second range: Changed registration procedure from “IETF Review” to “Specification required” * Added paragraph clarifying who is maintaining the initial entries until the registry is created by IANA Regards, Pablo. From: spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Xiejingrong <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 10 July 2019 at 05:55 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [spring] Comments on <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-01> But one point I am even more confused: The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior numbers are maintained by the working group until the RFC is published. Note to the RFC Editor: Remove this paragraph before publication. Why does this document say to create a new registry, but hold the Behavior numbers privately ? We need the IANA registry be created and allocation from the registry.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
