Hi Kireeti, Just as a data point for comparison, the drafts in PCE WG were discussed in the past. As part of use of PCE as a central controller PCECC (RFC 8283) work items -
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-05 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-01 The focus was on the controller to instruct the node with the SID allocations when the controller learns about the existence of node and the PCEP session is in place. We could also evaluate a request/reply from the node as well if that approach is required. Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kireeti Kompella < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:09 AM Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Kireeti, >> >> I would like to challenge a bit your fundamental assumption which is to state that while loopbacks are very important and locally significant and warrant manual/nms provisioning SIDs are not. > > > Actually, what I said at the mike is that I believe that both loopbacks and global SIDs should be managed by DHCP. But that's a distraction; the point at hand is whether global SIDs should be managed "manually" (or by NMS or equivalent) (i.e., static), or by a protocol (say DHCP) (i.e., dynamic). You say the former ... thanks for the feedback. > > -- > Kireeti > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
