Folks,
We have explored many facets of SRv6 and SRv6, sometime passionately. I think
that this exploration is a good thing. In the words of Tolkien, "All who wander
are not lost."
But it may be time to refocus on the following:
* For many operators, SRv6 is not deployable unless the problem of header
length is addressed
* Many objections the uSID proposal remain unanswered
* SRv6+ offers an alternative solution
Given these three facts, I think that it would be a mistake to discontinue work
on SRv6+.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
