Dear Ron,

I think you forgot few main points in the summary:

* Many operators use SR-MPLS successfully and it has been both standardized
and successfully deployed in the network with interoperable implementations

* The overhead on the data plane of SRv6+ is very comparable to overhead of
SR-MPLS

* The control plane extensions BGP, IGP are available for SR-MPLS and non
are available for SRv6+

* SRv6+ requires a new mapping of SIDs to prefixes to be distributed by
control plane

* If operators choose not to use MPLS transport SR-MPLS can be easily
transported over IPv4 or IPv6 vanilla data plane

* Extensions for additional applications like L3VPNs or L2VPNs will require
another set of protocol and implementation changes.

* If there are vendors who do not want to provide SR-MPLS SID mapping to
IPv6 addresses in their control planes let's focus standardization and
industry work in this direction.

With all of the above I think it would be a serious mistake - at this point
of time - to continue work on SRv6+ in the IETF.

Thank you,
Robert.


On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:08 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Folks,
>
>
>
> We have explored many facets of SRv6 and SRv6, sometime passionately. I
> think that this exploration is a good thing. In the words of Tolkien, “All
> who wander are not lost.”
>
>
>
> But it may be time to refocus on the following:
>
>
>
>    - For many operators, SRv6 is not deployable unless the problem of
>    header length is addressed
>    - Many objections the uSID proposal remain unanswered
>    - SRv6+ offers an alternative solution
>
>
>
> Given these three facts, I think that it would be a mistake to discontinue
> work on SRv6+.
>
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to