Hi, If you say you are an operator, and ask us to disclose on where, for what, scale and use case, please describe yours at first in very detail.
thanks, --satoru 2019/09/10 23:29、Sander Steffann <san...@steffann.nl>のメール: > Hi, > >> That was my point in the email thread “Regaining Focus on SRv6 and SRv6+”; >> >> • SRH has been around since 5 years with now 22 versions the last call is >> done, it’s on its way to become an RFC >> • ISIS/SRv6 is out there since 2015 with lots of iterations >> >> After all these years, why starting something new now and not finish first >> what is already started ? > > Because many problems are identified in the current work, and I realised I > don't like what I see. > >> If there is more needs/requirements, why wasn’t it raised while we were >> riding on SRH 2014-2019+, and net png ? > > It's not needs/requirements, it's mostly the lack of a KISS approach > >> Maybe as an IETFer/Vendor > > I'm an operator > >> “real deployment” doesn’t seem to impress you, > > Please elaborate about the real deployment. Where was it deployed? In what > kind of networks? On what scale? For which use cases? > >> but it allows to cycle back and tweak, optimize and enhance 5 years of work >> (ex.: uSID which is a building block of the overall SRv6 architecture. > > I agree. But after 5 years of (re)engineering) it's time to step back and > look at the solution again with fresh eyes. > https://hackernoon.com/delete-your-code-c5d2dc59f1ff > >> If we can finish what we started, then we can start something new – such as >> your proposal. > > I don't like the design of the current solution, and you seem to suggest that > I have to stall work on what I would like until you have what you would like > *. That doesn't work for me. > > Cheers, > Sander > > *: Especially with the current attitude/language in the drafts that seems to > promote the current work as the only true solution, and everything else as > secondary. That might not be the intention, but that is how it appears. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
