<snip> Hi, Robert:
But the concept of SRv6+ is more clear than the SRv6(topology/service instruction separation; different instruction carried in different IPv6 EH). Hi Aijun, Can you please various thread to gauge the complexity, incompleteness and why CRH (aka SRv6+) makes no sense, e.g.,: * Countless responses from Robert, includinghttps://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/_V8dsQOeRTuK2r7Lfi77bgICqhE * Many responses like https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/wFDK_Be7lEt4s191m61WdUOEzL4 * Many responses from Dirk, including https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6Bm4nN5ah8rFb7VutexK30kRUPM * Excellent points from Dan https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/OB1l41EhhUu8x8XEnKaBTdczDj4. * Many reasons like https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/D7IFJakb5Ew2iMXUfvf1wub7arQ Hope it helps, Thanks Regards … Zafar <snip>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
