Robert,
I was thinking about SR-compressed-6. SRc6 is a nice abbreviation for that.
If the WG agrees, I will update the drafts.
Ron
From: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 8:28 PM
To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>
Cc: Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; EXT - daniel.bern...@bell.ca
<daniel..bern...@bell.ca>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Chengli
(Cheng Li) <chengl...@huawei.com>; Stewart Bryant <stewart.bry...@gmail.com>;
SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>; SING Team <s.i.n.g.team.0...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] SR-MPLS over IPv6？
Hi Ron,
While sitting and watching this very educational thread to enhance anyone
linguistic skills why don't you just call your architecture as either SRc6 or
SRs6 and move on ?
Legend:
c - compressed
s - squeezed or shrank
Best,
Robert.
PS. That is not to say that I suddenly think the proposal is overall sound :)
Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
