Hi Ron, You may also consider *SR-mapped-6* (SRm6) as it even better reflects the spirit of the proposal.
Thx, R. On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 4:26 PM Ron Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert, > > > > I was thinking about SR-compressed-6. SRc6 is a nice abbreviation for that. > > > > If the WG agrees, I will update the drafts. > > > > Ron > > > > > > *From:* Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2019 8:28 PM > *To:* Ron Bonica <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Zafar Ali (zali) <[email protected]>; EXT - [email protected] < > [email protected]>; Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>; Chengli > (Cheng Li) <[email protected]>; Stewart Bryant < > [email protected]>; SPRING WG List <[email protected]>; SING Team < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [spring] SR-MPLS over IPv6？ > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > While sitting and watching this very educational thread to enhance anyone > linguistic skills why don't you just call your architecture as either SRc6 > or SRs6 and move on ? > > > > Legend: > > > > c - compressed > > s - squeezed or shrank > > > > Best, > > Robert. > > > > PS. That is not to say that I suddenly think the proposal is overall sound > :) > > > > > > Juniper Business Use Only >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
