Hi Ron, You may also consider *SR-mapped-6* (SRm6) as it even better reflects the spirit of the proposal.
Thx, R. On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 4:26 PM Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net> wrote: > Robert, > > > > I was thinking about SR-compressed-6. SRc6 is a nice abbreviation for that. > > > > If the WG agrees, I will update the drafts. > > > > Ron > > > > > > *From:* Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> > *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2019 8:28 PM > *To:* Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net> > *Cc:* Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>; EXT - daniel.bern...@bell.ca < > daniel.bern...@bell.ca>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Chengli > (Cheng Li) <chengl...@huawei.com>; Stewart Bryant < > stewart.bry...@gmail.com>; SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>; SING Team < > s.i.n.g.team.0...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* Re: [spring] SR-MPLS over IPv6？ > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > While sitting and watching this very educational thread to enhance anyone > linguistic skills why don't you just call your architecture as either SRc6 > or SRs6 and move on ? > > > > Legend: > > > > c - compressed > > s - squeezed or shrank > > > > Best, > > Robert. > > > > PS. That is not to say that I suddenly think the proposal is overall sound > :) > > > > > > Juniper Business Use Only >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
