+1
Best Regards
Zongpeng Du (cmcc)
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)"<[email protected]>;
Date: Wed, Feb 26, 2020 08:22 PM
To: "'SPRING WG List'"<[email protected]>;
Cc: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>;"draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming"<[email protected]>;
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC -
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
+1
Cheng
From: ipv6 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gengxuesong (Geng
Xuesong)
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 8:19 PM
To: Lizhenbin <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 'SPRING WG
List' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC -
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
+1
Best Regards
Xuesong
From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lizhenbin
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 7:55 PM
To: [email protected]; 'SPRING WG List' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
<[email protected]>
Subject: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC -
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Hi Bruno and WG,
The LC has lasted for almost 3 months which greatly exceeds the expected 2
week. In the process all the comments have been resolved while some issues is
raised again and again with little value.
On the other hand, there have been multiple commercial implementation and
inter-op test and almost 20 deployments for SRv6 which justify the solution
proposed by the draft in practice.
We sincerely request to close the LC of the draft and move forward.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2019 1:15 AM
To: 'SPRING WG List' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
<[email protected]>
Subject: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Hello SPRING, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming [1]. Please read this
document if you haven't read the most recent version, and send your comments to
the SPRING WG list, no later than December 20. You may copy the 6MAN WG
for IPv6 related comment, but consider not duplicating emails on the 6MAN
mailing list for the comments which are only spring specifics. If you
are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the
mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point. This may
help avoiding that the thread become specific to this point and that other
points get forgotten (or that the thread get converted into parallel
independent discussions) Thank you, Bruno [1]
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-05
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites
ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez
le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute
responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used
or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails
may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified,
changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
