On 3/3/20 13:07, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
[....]
Good.
How do you propose that we get an evaluation and formal answer from the IESG on
this point?
My proposal is to ask while asking the IESG review on
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming.
THat seems to late in the process.
May I ask what's the status of this I-D? -
On one hand, both you and Martin declared consensus to move it forward.
On another hand, the authors keep making changes to address comments
(good) so what the wg will ship will be different from what the document
on which you claimed consensus. Besides, the datatrackers lists the
document as "in WGLC".
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
