On 27/5/20 18:50, Robert Raszuk wrote: [...]
I am not against CRH. But what I am against is that CRH/SRm6 authors already bounced back via SPRING doors so they have chosen to try to enter via 6man window. That is not proper style for any proposal.
As someone that has experienced how folks have resorted to very twisted readings of RFC2460, and how they have undermined appropriate further clarifications in what became RFC8200, both in the context of what became RFC8754 and the ongoing network-programming draft (subject of an appeal), I find this statement kind of amusing.
Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
