On 28-May-20 10:39, Robert Raszuk wrote: ... > Maybe we should just drop right here this "limited domain" restriction/scope > for any solution being discussed here ?
In that case we should definitely never have adopted draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header, whose first reference is RFC8402, which is very explicitly a description of a limited doman model: "Segment Routing domain (SR domain): the set of nodes participating in the source-based routing model... It is expected that all nodes in an SR domain are managed by the same administrative entity." The CRH draft says essentially the same: " o Is designed to operate within a network domain." Brian _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring