Hi Ketan,
Surely. Regarding EANTC, yes, I read those reports but there are no many such
implementation details.
Thx.
SY,Boris
On Friday, April 30, 2021, 7:12:31 PM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
<[email protected]> wrote:
#yiv3975518635 #yiv3975518635 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}
_filtered {}#yiv3975518635 #yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635MsoNormal,
#yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635MsoNormal, #yiv3975518635
div.yiv3975518635MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 a:link,
#yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3975518635 pre
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv3975518635
p.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal, #yiv3975518635
li.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal, #yiv3975518635
div.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635
p.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal,
#yiv3975518635
li.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal,
#yiv3975518635
div.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635
span.yiv3975518635HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;}#yiv3975518635
span.yiv3975518635EmailStyle23
{font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv3975518635
.yiv3975518635MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv3975518635
div.yiv3975518635WordSection1 {}#yiv3975518635
Hi Boris,
I will leave it the chair/shepherd guidance on this one.
EANTC has been running multi-vendor interop for Segment Routing that covers
this document along with signalling protocols like PCEP and BGP-SRTE every year
since at least 2016. It includes various controller and router products. Their
results are published in whitepapers which might perhaps provide at least some
of the information that you are looking.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Boris Hassanov <[email protected]>
Sent: 30 April 2021 20:49
To: [email protected]; James Guichard <[email protected]>; Ketan
Talaulikar (ketant) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
Hi Ketan,
Yes, I meant an implementation status section in the draft.
The either one way, which will be easier to accomplish. We need to fix such
status somewhere, IMO.
Thank you.
SY,
Boris
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, 8:48:06 AM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Boris,
Thanks for your review and feedback.
Did you imply that we add an add an implementation status section in the draft?
Or are you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and deployment
status? I ask because the Implementation Status section is generally removed
before publication as RFC.
Regarding implementation, I am aware of support for this draft in Cisco’s
Routing products for many years now with multiple deployments. I am also aware
of other vendor support & operator deployment. However, would request other WG
members to respond/confirm.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: spring <[email protected]>On Behalf Of Boris Hassanov
Sent: 28 April 2021 02:43
To: [email protected]; James Guichard <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
Hi James and all,
I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very
detailed, helpful and interesting document.
I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to
get such info about implementation details.
Thank you.
SY,
Boris
On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear WG:
This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].
Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send
your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021.
If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the
mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response
to the IPR call in the previous email thread.
Thanks!
Jim, Joel & Bruno
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
