Agree Jeff.
Thank you.
SY,Boris

    On Friday, April 30, 2021, 11:46:36 PM GMT+3, Jeff Tantsura 
<jefftant.i...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Boris/Ketan,

Traditionally, we have been using Wiki to track implementations status, let’s 
take the same approach here?

Thanks and have a great weekend
Cheers,JeffOn Apr 27, 2021, 10:48 PM -0700, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) 
<ketant=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>, wrote:


Hi Boris,

 

Thanks for your review and feedback.

 

Did you imply that we add an implementation status section in the draft? Or are 
you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and deployment status? I 
ask because the Implementation Status section is generally removed before 
publication as RFC.

 

Regarding implementation, I am aware of support for this draft in Cisco’s 
Routing products for many years now with multiple deployments. I am also aware 
of other vendor support & operator deployment. However, would request other WG 
members to respond/confirm.

 

Thanks,

Ketan

 

From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Boris Hassanov
Sent: 28 April 2021 02:43
To: spring@ietf.org; James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

 

Hi James and all,

 

I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very 
detailed, helpful and interesting document.

I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to 
get such info about implementation details.

 

Thank you.

 

SY,

Boris

 

On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard 
<james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote:

 

 

Dear WG:

 

This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for 
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].

 

Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send 
your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021.

 

If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the 
mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.

 

Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response 
to the IPR call in the previous email thread. 

 

Thanks!

 

Jim, Joel & Bruno

 
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/  
 

 

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
  
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to