Yes, support.
From an operator's point of view: I think this can add valuable
enhancements to SR enabled networks.
Best regards, Martin
Am 07.06.21 um 14:33 schrieb James Guichard:
Dear WG:
The IPPM WG has adopted
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-00
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-00&data=04%7C01%7Cjguichar%40futurewei.com%7C68a7e8999c0e4d09f3fa08d927af658a%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637584456542518360%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=G3aKv%2FCnBQskcEVz4GCGVK2tdCrzBldv3yBiUXkYR%2B8%3D&reserved=0>
as a WG document. In a previous communication (December 16^th 2020), the
SPRING chairs decided not to adopt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt>
into the WG until its companion document was accepted by the IPPM WG.
This has now happened and therefore we feel it is now time to revisit
the WG adoption of the SPRING document.
Due to the lapse of several months since the initial WG adoption call,
the chairs would like to start another 2-week WG adoption call for
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt>,
ending June 21^st 2021.
After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for
WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons
for that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as
consent.
Thanks!
Jim, Joel & Bruno
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
