I agree as well – DT spent a year to come up with an analysis and now have a 
conclusion. In my view, we are ready to move with a single standard solution. 
This will unlock the vendors community to adopt an SRv6 compression standard 
and allow operators to move forward.

At the end of the analysis document, CSID seems to be the clear winner.

Thanks
dan

From: spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Eduard Metz 
<[email protected]>
Date: Friday, July 30, 2021 at 7:24 AM
To: Gyan Mishra <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]>, 
"Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Wim Henderickx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXT]Re: [spring] SRv6 compression

Agree.
The DT has done a great job in the analysis.

Moving forward with a single, standards track solution is preferred/required 
for interoperable SRv6 implementations.

cheers,
  Eduard


On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:09 PM Gyan Mishra 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

For all operators around the world looking at deployment of SRv6 compression 
and being in a  holding pattern waiting for SRv6 compression to be standardized 
by the IETF.

Given the ubiquitous importance of SRV6 compression and MSD issues with long 
strict SR-TE explicit route object,  it is critical for interoperability for 
all steering use cases that exist today: enterprise, internet, private, access 
network - 5G wireless xHaul, mobile core, wireline, MBB, FBB.

We as a WG need a single standardized solution for SRv6 compression for 
interoperability to work and all vendors marching to the same sheet of music.

I agree that the NVO3 - GENEVE is a solid precedence path forward to take and 
for Spring WG to come to consensus and standardize on one solution and progress 
the other solutions as informational if implementations already exist.

Kind Regards

Gyan
Verizon Inc

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:12 AM Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Same here. We want a single standard method of SID compression to allow the WG 
to focus on finalizing it and get vendors hardware implementations updated.

Regards,
Mustapha.

From: spring <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:54 AM
To: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 compression

I agree with Wim’s statement that the precedent in NVO3 *could* apply here too: 
pick one solution as Standard’s track RFC, and once it is done, the others 
might be documented as Informational RFCs if they have implementations.

That would help the industry to move forward.

Thanks.
Jorge


From: spring <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on 
behalf of Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 9:11 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [spring] SRv6 compression
Given the design team accomplished the work on providing requirements and 
analysis to compress an SRv6 SID list, I would recommend we pick 1 solution 
similar to what was done in NVO3 (when we discussed GENEVE, GUE, GPE, etc) 
given this has to be implemented in HW..

I hope we can conclude on this asap and move forward on this topic

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--

[http://ss7.vzw.com/is/image/VerizonWireless/vz-logo-email]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

Email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

M 301 502-1347

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to