Hi Chaires and WG,
I support to adoption this draft. As we known, the draft has been discussed in
the DT for more than 2 years. The requirement draft has been accepted and
adopted by WG. The solution compatible with the standard SRv6 is preferred for
the SRv6 compression, that is the solution provided by this draft. And I think
the solution proposed by this draft is just one solution with 2 flavors, which
share the same SRv6 processes. The provider/user could use the flavors
according to their SID planning, just like using other flavors.
Best regards,
Aihua
原始邮件
发件人：JamesGuichard
收件人：SPRING WG;
抄送人：spring-cha...@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年10月01日 22:07
主 题 ：[spring] WG Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
Dear WG:
The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression.
The apparent inclination of the working group is to use
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
as the basis for its compression standardization work. That is part of what
this email attempts to confirm.
Because of the above the chairs would like to issue a 2-week WG call for
adoption ending October 15th for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
but with some clear guidelines as follows. By expressing support for adoption
of this document you are fully aware of and are acknowledging that:
The SPRING working group is adopting a document that has multiple SRv6 Endpoint
behaviors.
The document is a “living” document; it may change as it goes through review
and analysis by the SPRING working group.
All open discussion points raised on our mailing list MUST be addressed BEFORE
said document is allowed to progress from the working group to publication. A
list of these discussion points will be documented in the WG document and
maintained by the document editor in conjunction with the chairs.
If this document is adopted by the working group, the chairs specify as part of
the adoption call that the following text describing an open issue be added to
the document in the above-described open issues section:
"Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize one data
plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6 EndPoint
behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data plane solutions,
the working group will address whether this is valid and coherent with its one
data plane solution objective.".
Please consider the above guidelines as you decide on whether to support or not
this WG adoption. Please express clearly your reasoning for support/non-support
as well as any open discussion points you would like addressed should the
document be adopted into the working group.
Thanks!
Jim, Bruno & Joel
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
