Kireeti, all,

Being a co-author of draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression, I recuse 
myself from assessing the WG consensus on this document.

--Bruno




Orange Restricted
From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 9:56 PM
To: James Guichard <[email protected]>
Cc: Kireeti Kompella <[email protected]>; SPRING WG <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

I also object to WG chairs who are also co-authors of a draft participating in 
the process of advancing the draft through the WG process, whether it is WG 
adoption, WGLC or IETF LC.

Look up "recuse" in the dictionary.

:K


On Oct 1, 2021, at 07:04, James Guichard 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Dear WG:

The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses 
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move 
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression.

The apparent inclination of the working group is to use 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
 as the basis for its compression standardization work. That is part of what 
this email attempts to confirm.

Because of the above the chairs would like to issue a 2-week WG call for 
adoption ending October 15th 
forhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
 but with some clear guidelines as follows. By expressing support for adoption 
of this document you are fully aware of and are acknowledging that:


  1.  The SPRING working group is adopting a document that has multiple SRv6 
Endpoint behaviors.
  2.  The document is a "living" document; it may change as it goes through 
review and analysis by the SPRING working group.
  3.  All open discussion points raised on our mailing list MUST be addressed 
BEFORE said document is allowed to progress from the working group to 
publication. A list of these discussion points will be documented in the WG 
document and maintained by the document editor in conjunction with the chairs.
  4.  If this document is adopted by the working group, the chairs specify as 
part of the adoption call that the following text describing an open issue be 
added to the document in the above-described open issues section:

     *   "Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize 
one data plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6 
EndPoint behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data plane 
solutions, the working group will address whether this is valid and coherent 
with its one data plane solution objective.".

Please consider the above guidelines as you decide on whether to support or not 
this WG adoption. Please express clearly your reasoning for support/non-support 
as well as any open discussion points you would like addressed should the 
document be adopted into the working group.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno & Joel


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to