Ahmed,

I don't recall the DT recommending the CSID. In fact, the word "recommend" does 
not appear anywhere in the analysis document.

As a member of the DT, I don't recommend CSID.

                                                                           Ron



Juniper Business Use Only
From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ahmed Bashandy
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 10:53 PM
To: James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>; SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


I support the adoption of this document.

  *   The network programming model (RFC8986) defines multiple behaviors, CSID 
is just adding the next and replace flavors
  *   The draft proposes a single SRv6 based data plane that defines next and 
replace behaviors. IMO that is consistent with RFC8986

  *   CSID has been recommended by the design team for SRv6 based compression
  *   Interop was done. That is more evidence that CSID is a single data plane 
solution
  *   IMO CSID is ready to become the basis for the SRv6 compression solution
  *   Being an SRv6 data plane-based solution, CSID is coherent with the one 
data plane solution objective
  *   CSID meets SRv6 compression requirements as single solution



Thanks



Ahmed


On 10/1/21 7:04 AM, James Guichard wrote:
Dear WG:

The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses 
received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to move 
forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression.

The apparent inclination of the working group is to use 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UB-06E0vV1hJFKLsWYZym6F3d_lXgEa-0TT6vPXh5GKmmrA9UhFLCWIRgLQM66Td$>
 as the basis for its compression standardization work. That is part of what 
this email attempts to confirm.

Because of the above the chairs would like to issue a 2-week WG call for 
adoption ending October 15th for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UB-06E0vV1hJFKLsWYZym6F3d_lXgEa-0TT6vPXh5GKmmrA9UhFLCWIRgLQM66Td$>
 but with some clear guidelines as follows. By expressing support for adoption 
of this document you are fully aware of and are acknowledging that:


  1.  The SPRING working group is adopting a document that has multiple SRv6 
Endpoint behaviors.
  2.  The document is a "living" document; it may change as it goes through 
review and analysis by the SPRING working group.
  3.  All open discussion points raised on our mailing list MUST be addressed 
BEFORE said document is allowed to progress from the working group to 
publication. A list of these discussion points will be documented in the WG 
document and maintained by the document editor in conjunction with the chairs.
  4.  If this document is adopted by the working group, the chairs specify as 
part of the adoption call that the following text describing an open issue be 
added to the document in the above-described open issues section:

     *   "Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize 
one data plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6 
EndPoint behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data plane 
solutions, the working group will address whether this is valid and coherent 
with its one data plane solution objective.".

Please consider the above guidelines as you decide on whether to support or not 
this WG adoption. Please express clearly your reasoning for support/non-support 
as well as any open discussion points you would like addressed should the 
document be adopted into the working group.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno & Joel




_______________________________________________

spring mailing list

spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UB-06E0vV1hJFKLsWYZym6F3d_lXgEa-0TT6vPXh5GKmmrA9UhFLCWIRgDaeqmAm$>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to