Hi  Joel, WG,

I agree that the issue has been resolved.

According to the SRv6 dataplane definition in the document 
"draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression,"all SIDs can co-exist in the same SRH, 
including Next-C-SID and Replace-C-SID.

This allows for SRv6 to be a single and consistent dataplane solution.



Thanks,
Changwang


From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2023 5:09 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression


As per the discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG chairs (myself 
and Alvaro specifically) are attempting to determine if we can close the open 
issues regarding 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/  The 
editors have entered proposed resolutions for all open issues.  This email is 
to determine if the working group considers issue 1 closable.

Issue 1 reads:

Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize one
data plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6
EndPoint behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data
plane solutions, the working group will address whether this is valid
and coherent with its one data plane solution objective.

The editors have entered:

All SIDs of the SRv6 dataplane (defined in this document and in other 
documents) can co-exist in the same SRH. This make SRv6 a single, consistent 
dataplane solution.

Please speak up if you agree this resolves this issue, or if you consider that 
it does not resolve the issue.  Objections (and even support if practical) 
should be specific as to the technical grounds for the statement.  Silence will 
not be considered consent.

This call will run for 3 weeks to allow time for at least some people's August 
vacations and in hopes fo getting a clear reading from the WG.

Separate calls for other issues will be issued on a schedule that the chairs 
have selected to try to balance getting sufficient focus with getting this 
done, as it has been a long time.

Note that if the WG agrees that all issues may be marked as closed, the chairs 
anticipate issuing the WG last call shortly after that is determined.  Speaking 
up early will help us in all dimensions.  If we determine that not all issues 
can be marked as closed, the chairs will work with the document editors to 
determine suitable next steps.


Thank you,

Joel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C, 
which is
intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use 
of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total 
or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify 
the sender
by phone or email immediately and delete it!
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to