Hi,
I think the topic of when the candidate path is valid and the validation
criteria is an important topic, which can make SR Policy to fulfill the SLA
requirements better.
It seems that there's not a whole picture in this draft yet to show how the
enhanced CP validation method works in the network, maybe some descriptions of
the control/management plane function can be added.
Regards,
Yao
Original
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Date: 2025年11月25日 17:05
Subject: [spring] Request for Discussion: Validity of SR Policy Candidate Path
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Hi WG，
We would like to initiate a discussion on the
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity/ .
This draft builds upon RFC 9256 and it adds further considerations to the
existing validation mechanisms in RFC 9256, with a focus on improving the
current approach to CP validity checks.It defines new quantitative criteria
(e.g., minimum valid SL count and weight) to refine the CP validity
determination specified in RFC 9256, addressing limitations inherent in the
simple "at least one active SID-List" criterion.
This work is critical for improving the reliability and operational accuracy of
SR Policy deployments.
We request feedback on the mailing list to help us advance this draft. Thank
you!
BR,
Ran
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
