Dear Yao,



Thank you for your suggestion for improving the draft's clarity regarding the 
complete protocol specification.
To address this, we will explicitly reference the accompanying control plane 
draft (BGP/PCEP extensions) in the document. This reference will confirm that 
the required signaling protocol specification is fully covered in a dedicated 
companion document, thus providing the complete technical picture.



Best regards,
Ran


Original


From: 刘尧
To: 陈然00080434;
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;
Date: 2025年11月27日 09:38
Subject: [spring] Re: Request for Discussion: Validity of SR Policy Candidate 
Path

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]


Hi,
I think the topic of when the candidate path is valid and the validation 
criteria is an important topic, which can make SR Policy to fulfill the SLA 
requirements better. 
It seems that there's not a whole picture in this draft yet to show how the 
enhanced CP validation method works in the network, maybe some descriptions of 
the control/management  plane function can be added.

Regards,
Yao







To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Date: 2025年11月25日 17:05
Subject: [spring] Request for Discussion: Validity of SR Policy Candidate Path

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Hi WG,
We would like to initiate a discussion on the 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity/ .
This draft builds upon RFC 9256 and it adds further considerations to the 
existing validation mechanisms in RFC 9256, with a focus on improving the 
current approach to CP validity checks.It defines new quantitative criteria 
(e.g., minimum valid SL count and weight) to refine the CP validity 
determination specified in RFC 9256, addressing limitations inherent in the 
simple "at least one active SID-List" criterion.
This work is critical for improving the reliability and operational accuracy of 
SR Policy deployments.
We request feedback on the mailing list to help us advance this draft. Thank 
you!

BR,
Ran
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to