Now you are in a whole different arena of when work requires a PERMIT
and approval by the municipality.
Naturally the press would do adequate research and state that the
system was not adequately designed when it drowned the occupants.
Yea bad PR could happen.
Roland
On Jan 10, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Smith, Steven D. (CSFD) wrote:
Interesting point. I understand that some jurisdictions have not
adopted
or do not use NFPA 13, but if a jurisdiction does use or has adopted
NFPA 13 in some capacity, does that mean that if the facility burns
down, the sprinkler system would be considered to have been installed
and maintained per NFPA13/25?
Steve
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
