Pressure is measured at the pump and flow at the nozzles so why does the
friction loss from the pump to the nozzles matter so long as the 150%
capacity is observed.

Ron Fletcher
Aero Automatic Sprinkler
Phoenix, AZ   

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duross
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: fire pump test header size

What did you calculate for an outlet?  Just the manifold (5-10'), tee
(5-15'), nipple(?) and valve (5-25')?
At what flow per 2.5" outlet?  250 per?  What happens when you put
50-75-100' of hose, playpipe, monster or meter on it?
I'm sure the upsize rule is to minimize friction loss.  If it's in the
standard, it must be done.

Interesting thing I just noticed this afternoon.  I just got home from
an acceptance test just now.
I used 4 digital flowmeters on a derby cap for a 1500 GPM diesel.  They
have pressure gauges on them for FDV testing.
We had a gauge on the 8" to the derby with (6) 2.5" angle valves just
inside the wall at the butterfly header valve.
At 2250, we had a 16 PSI drop from the gauge on the 8" to the gauges on
the meters.  I thought that was substantial.
We pretty much balanced the flow between the four meters but a drop that
great was surprising to me.
3' of 8" to a derby (this is like a bullhead tee hydraulically I would
imagine) and a 2.5x5 nipple and angle valve.
16 PSI at roughly 550 GPM.  I thought this to be substantial and they
all read the same and are almost new.

Tom Duross


Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852
This is from the 2007 edition of NFPA #20.

5.19.3.4 Pipe Size. The pipe size shall be in accordance with one of the
following two methods:

(1)      Where the pipe between the hose valve header and connection to
the
pump discharge pipe is over 15 ft (4.5 m) in length, the next larger
pipe size than required by 5.19.3.1.3 shall be used.

(2)*      This pipe is permitted to be sized by hydraulic calculations
based
on a total flow of 150 percent of rated pump capacity, including the
following:

(a)      This calculation shall include friction loss for the total
length
of pipe plus equivalent lengths of fittings, control valve, and hose
valves, plus elevation loss, from the pump discharge flange to the hose
valve outlets.

(b)      The installation shall be proven by a test flowing the maximum
water available.


I just calculated a test header located approx. 65' from a 750 gpm pump
and it seems to work easily with 6" pipe flowing 1,125 gpm in lieu of
increasing the pipe to 8". Has anyone got experience using this method?

Space is the issue and 6" works much better then 8" in this situation.


Thanks,
Greg McGahan


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to