Be careful if you take this exception cause then: "the building would not be considered completely sprinklered in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 for the purposes of allowing construction alternatives, such as height and areas increases, corridor rating reduction and other code trade-offs".
This is a quote from the 2000 IFC commentary. Usually the contractor ends up with concealed sprinklers in the ceiling. rick matsuda, city of dallas >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/21/07 11:58AM >>> Yes, that exception is for Group A-3 Occupancies, which would fit for this type of application. Just take a look at section 903.2.1.3 (2006) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
