That is a common problem we have here in the mountains. The water models for a lot of our systems, are really out there. The water purveyor stops all reports at 3500 Gpm, the max from a single hyd. for ISO. But the model will show not 3500 @ 20, which is what they usually give us, but like 6000 @ 94 Psi is the actual flow for a specific node on their system. And yes it ages the pipe based upon when it was installed, and the average daily flow. We find the model to be more accurate than any flow tests we do cause we just can't flow enough water, for our curves to work with any accuracy.
As Roland has suggested when we reach system demand we usually stop.
Thom McMahon
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488-2136
Tel: 970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926
----- Original Message ----- From: "Roland Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: Proper Flow Test Recording


The reason you need an adequate drop is to avoid extrapolating to a system demand of 1,500 gpm way down the curve based on a tiny drop in test pressure (where a very small difference in readings will create a huge difference down the curve. I state this in order to differ, on occasion, from the 25% drop. Some water supplies are very strong and you'll be opening 5 or more hydrants to get that drop. For instance, the plant I spent 5 years at, the supply was 130 PSI static and 100 psi residual at 10,000 gpm. DO it when you have to BUT if the system demand is less than the residential flow, what does it matter how much a percentage drop occurred. You know you have a good read on the available water supply at the required system demand.

Roland

On Aug 3, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Scott A. Futrell wrote:

I would add to George's response that to do the test in accordance  with
NFPA 291 you should also have a static to residual drop of 25 % and  your
flow should exceed the expected sprinkler demand plus hose streams in
gpm.  In other words your static should drop from 60 psi to at  least 45
psi (you may have to open more than one hydrant or more than one butt)
and your flow should exceed gpm (if you anticipate 0.20 over 3,000
square feet you will need at lease 600 gpm plus 500 gpm hose so a
minimum flow of 1,100 gpm).

Also, if you use the pumper connection there is an additional
coefficient to include in addition to the 0.7. 0.8, or 0.9.  Again,  see
NFPA 291.
Scott

(763) 425-1001 Office
(612) 759-5556 Cell


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George
Church
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Proper Flow Test Recording

There's actually quite a bit to know, and I hope to remember them  since
I
plan to run one this afternoon, too- if they fix the main break. Since
it's
2 miles south of my house, what a great thing to do on a Fri in  August.

If the flow is from one direction, you read static from the hydrant
before
where your tap is, or will be, and flow a hydrant past it. If  direction
of
flow in a grid isn't obvious, you could reverse it, but if it is a big
main
and flows aren't taxing it, I wouldn't sweat it.

Measure the ID of the hydrant butt(s) you're flowing, confirming  2.5" or
adjust in the formula. Check if it is a .7,.8, or .9 hydrant, so  you can
enter the appropriate coefficient (and not have to drive back and
explain to
the police why you've got your finger in a hydrant butt on Friday
night).
If it's a .9, and FM is your job's underwriter, you'll have to use  a .8
coefficient and degrade supply. Fortunately, if it's a .7 you get a
bonus
from FM, it's still a .8 if you wish, but I'd still use the .7- just a
jab
at standardization of variables.

Make sure your gauges are new or calibrated, liquid-filled to minimize
bouncing. Might be too late to go buy a couple Hose Monsters, we swear
by
them for all sorts of things- we know, for instance, what gpm we  flushed
an
UG lead-in at.

Get elevation difference between your static/residual hydrant and  FF of
your
building.

Ask the water co what their tank elevation was during the test, what
lowest
tank gradient is, and subtract the elevation pressure from both static
and
residual points on your curve- that's the worst your supply should get
(except the zillion other things like a new bottling plant that can
affect
it in the future).

The pitot tube I assume you're using should be held half the diameter
away
from the opening when taking readings, and you need to bleed the  air out
of
the zone between the tip and the gauge- that's what that little  bleeder
valve is for.

Wear rubbers or boots. Let the water co guy open and close the  hydrant.
Don't rip up crops. Don't attach a hose monster directly to a hydrant,
it
needs some hose for accuracy and sometimes they start spinning on the
hydrant - leading to a large amount of water on your head -repeatedly.
We
found this can cause severe abdominal distress to young design  managers
witnessing this, plus its cold when you walk in a store to get coffee
cause
you're soaked on the way home. Watch where the puddles form so you  don't
get
drenched by passing traffic. Be prepared to laugh if a convertible
drives
thru it. Obviously, 30+ years of water test war stories could add a  lot
to
this, but I need to get some stuff dome before going to mine.

Finally- enjoy being out of the office and playing with static and
dynamic
energy.

glc


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Lindner
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proper Flow Test Recording

In order to get a flow test done for a project, the local water  utility
will
perform the flow test but we need to be present to "record the  numbers".
Being that I have never had to do this, I wanted to ask the group for
their
thoughts and recommendations of what is considered "standard operating
procedure".

I have already printed out a copy of AFSA's "Flow Test Information
Sheet".
I can pretty much figure out where to put most of the "info" but would
appreciate any pointers, methods, etc that others use.  What should  I be
looking for, what should I be asking for, etc.

One item that I was told a while back when requesting a flow test  was to
ask
for the system to be tested both directions, ie, read static on  hydrant
1,
residual on hyd 2 and then switch everything around to then be able to
static hyd 2, residual hyd 1.  Guess my question is..  is that  necessary
or
just overkill and a waste of time?

Appreciate any pointers.

Richard
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to