To All:

The proper definition, in my humble opinion is still beam and girder
construction, therefore obstructed contruction.

Girder, by definition, is "a strong horizontal beam used as a main
support inside a building" ie, the support beam system (girder) on which
the purlins sit.
There are no length nor volume limitations imposed by NFPA on this type
of construction, nor does it classify any type of "panel" configuration
be maintained.
The determining factor is that the SPACING between the purlins "framed
into or on" the girder must be between 3 ft to 7 1/2 ft on center.

If the beam/purlin spacing exceeds 7 1/2 ft on center, then you can
still classify it as PANEL construction, provided the 300 sq.ft. "panel"
limitation is met.

With typical purlin depths of 8" to 10", the following scenarios tend to
play out:

(1) If you classify it as unobstructed, your deflector distance will be
1" to 12" below the deck or insulation (with standard spray sprinklers).
(2) If the purlins are 12" in depth, you can still install the
sprinklers with the deflectors even with the bottom of the purlin and
meet the deflector and obstruction rules.
(3) If you classify it as obstructed, your deflector will be 1" to 6"
below the purlins not to exceed 22" below the deck or insulation.
(4) Or you can install the sprinklers with the deflector even with the
bottom of the purlins and meet the deflector and obstruction rules.
(5) If ESFR sprinklers are considered, then your main concern is if the
purlins are more than 12" deep, you must install ESFR's in every bay
formed by the purlins.

As to the "open space" formed by the purlins sitting on the girder, the
volume of opening created at each end of the span will not typically
create a large enough concern to warrant
a change in the construction definiton, in my opinion.

I would think that NFPA would have given direction on this if it was of
a major concern.

Thanks,

Ray Vance
Chief Engineering Tech.
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
www.waynefire.com






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
McGahan
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

Based on what? It clearly does not fall into panel construction due to
the space above the beam. They are not girders.

I am not fighting for or against, I just would like a conclusive answer.

Is there not a manufacturer or committee member there that could
enlighten us? I would think that the tests run on these storage heads
and such would have forced a definition for the manufacturers.

Greg

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
- FPDC
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

Up here, it usually goes beams, purlins above (on) the beams, steel deck
on the purlins. The insulation goes in between the purlins. Is the
insulation going on the metal deck roof?If the insulation comes to the
bottom of the purlin, it will create a fairly flat ceiling and I would
consider it unobstructed. If there is no insulation, I would think it
would be considered obstructed.


At 02:51 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
>No, above them.  A typical warehouse.
>
>Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
>1160 McKenzie Road
>Cantonment, FL 32533
>850-937-1850
>Fax: 850-937-1852
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
>- FPDC
>Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:50 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: purlins
>
>Is there insulation between the purlins?
>
>
>At 02:45 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
> >Poll:
> >
> >Are typical 8" and 10" purlins spaced 4-5' apart with open space 
> >above the beams where the purlins rest considered OBstructed or 
> >Unobstructed construction?
> >
> >
> >
> >Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
> >
> >1160 McKenzie Road
> >
> >Cantonment, FL 32533
> >
> >850-937-1850
> >
> >Fax: 850-937-1852
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> >
> >To Unsubscribe, send an email 
> >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>Todd G. Williams, PE
>Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>Stonington, Connecticut
>www.fpdc.com
>860.535.2080
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email 
>to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email 
>to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
www.fpdc.com
860.535.2080
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
2006 Inductee into "The Players Hall of Fame"
at The Great Games of Business
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc. "Best Places to Work"
Rated #1 in 2006
Large Business Category
by Orlando Business Journal
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to