As a follow up, here is an informal interpretation from NFSA on this type of 
issue from the March 13th E-Tech Alert.

Question 3 - Beam and Girder Pocket Limitations for Obstructed Construction

In NFPA 13 (annex section A.3.7.1(1) in the 2002 edition), the definition of 
beam and girder construction as a type of Obstructed Construction calls for 
"beams spaced 3 ft to 7-½ ft on center". However the definition does not 
provide a maximum square footage for the beam and girder pocket. We have a 
building that has steel I-beams spaced 7'-6" apart but these beams sit on 
larger trusses, thus creating an air gap above the two ends above the truss. 
This being said, can we consider this Obstructed Construction?

Answer: Yes. As described, the trusses are perpendicular to the beams and 
provide their support. If the tops of the beams are at the ceiling and the 
trusses are below then the beams should be considered the primary ceiling 
structure.  The sprinklers' ability to collect heat and distribute a spray 
pattern is going to be affected most by the structural members directly below 
the ceiling.  As you have noted, beam type construction spaced 3 to 7.5 feet on 
center is obstructed construction. There is no requirement that the beams frame 
into the trusses or that a maximum size of pocket be provided. The location of 
the trusses with regard to sprinkler spacing must be considered so that they do 
not create obstructions to sprinkler discharge patterns. 

In older editions of NFPA 13, beams that framed into other beams to form 
pockets less than 300 sq. ft. were given special consideration as "panel 
construction".  Sprinklers were permitted to be placed further below the 
ceiling due to the greater capacity of panel construction to bank heat. While 
this type of construction is still defined in annex section A.3.7.1(4), there 
is no allowance for greater sprinkler deflector distances below the ceiling. 
This annex section can be used, however, to justify obstructed construct ion 
deflector distances even where members are spaced more than 7.5 ft on center 
provided the ceiling pocket criteria is met. This can be useful in situations 
where there are multiple adjacent ceiling pockets.  


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Vance
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

To All:

The proper definition, in my humble opinion is still beam and girder 
construction, therefore obstructed contruction.

Girder, by definition, is "a strong horizontal beam used as a main support 
inside a building" ie, the support beam system (girder) on which the purlins 
sit.
There are no length nor volume limitations imposed by NFPA on this type of 
construction, nor does it classify any type of "panel" configuration be 
maintained.
The determining factor is that the SPACING between the purlins "framed into or 
on" the girder must be between 3 ft to 7 1/2 ft on center.

If the beam/purlin spacing exceeds 7 1/2 ft on center, then you can still 
classify it as PANEL construction, provided the 300 sq.ft. "panel"
limitation is met.

With typical purlin depths of 8" to 10", the following scenarios tend to play 
out:

(1) If you classify it as unobstructed, your deflector distance will be 1" to 
12" below the deck or insulation (with standard spray sprinklers).
(2) If the purlins are 12" in depth, you can still install the sprinklers with 
the deflectors even with the bottom of the purlin and meet the deflector and 
obstruction rules.
(3) If you classify it as obstructed, your deflector will be 1" to 6"
below the purlins not to exceed 22" below the deck or insulation.
(4) Or you can install the sprinklers with the deflector even with the bottom 
of the purlins and meet the deflector and obstruction rules.
(5) If ESFR sprinklers are considered, then your main concern is if the purlins 
are more than 12" deep, you must install ESFR's in every bay formed by the 
purlins.

As to the "open space" formed by the purlins sitting on the girder, the volume 
of opening created at each end of the span will not typically create a large 
enough concern to warrant a change in the construction definiton, in my opinion.

I would think that NFPA would have given direction on this if it was of a major 
concern.

Thanks,

Ray Vance
Chief Engineering Tech.
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
www.waynefire.com






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg McGahan
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

Based on what? It clearly does not fall into panel construction due to the 
space above the beam. They are not girders.

I am not fighting for or against, I just would like a conclusive answer.

Is there not a manufacturer or committee member there that could enlighten us? 
I would think that the tests run on these storage heads and such would have 
forced a definition for the manufacturers.

Greg

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
- FPDC
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

Up here, it usually goes beams, purlins above (on) the beams, steel deck on the 
purlins. The insulation goes in between the purlins. Is the insulation going on 
the metal deck roof?If the insulation comes to the bottom of the purlin, it 
will create a fairly flat ceiling and I would consider it unobstructed. If 
there is no insulation, I would think it would be considered obstructed.


At 02:51 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
>No, above them.  A typical warehouse.
>
>Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
>1160 McKenzie Road
>Cantonment, FL 32533
>850-937-1850
>Fax: 850-937-1852
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
>- FPDC
>Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:50 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: purlins
>
>Is there insulation between the purlins?
>
>
>At 02:45 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
> >Poll:
> >
> >Are typical 8" and 10" purlins spaced 4-5' apart with open space 
> >above the beams where the purlins rest considered OBstructed or 
> >Unobstructed construction?
> >
> >
> >
> >Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
> >
> >1160 McKenzie Road
> >
> >Cantonment, FL 32533
> >
> >850-937-1850
> >
> >Fax: 850-937-1852
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> >
> >To Unsubscribe, send an email
> >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>Todd G. Williams, PE
>Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>Stonington, Connecticut
>www.fpdc.com
>860.535.2080
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email
>to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sprinklerforum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
>To Unsubscribe, send an email
>to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
www.fpdc.com
860.535.2080
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
2006 Inductee into "The Players Hall of Fame"
at The Great Games of Business
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc. "Best Places to Work"
Rated #1 in 2006
Large Business Category
by Orlando Business Journal
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to