Didn't we just have a discussion about 13 allowing some unlisted
materials used commonly such as pipe that meets certain other
criterion. I'm not suggesting that split rings necessarily meet such a
criterion but....

On 11/2/07, Bill Minkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  1" & 1 1/4" threaded sch. 40 branch lines in high-rise residential dwelling
> units (owner declined CPVC). In order to clear HVAC in central corridor I
> had to rise up to 2" CL below concrete deck and had to maintain this in the
> dwelling units to clear HVAC in there. With not enough room for a rod &
> swivel ring I opted for the split-ring since I had used them before for
> stand-off and close clearance to deck. Our field superintendent pointed out
> that split rings are not listed and only rated for 180# loads, so my
> quandary. Even the Appendix of NFPA-13 (FigA.9.1.1) shows split rings as one
> of the common acceptable types but the guts of 9.1(2002) seem to rule
> unlisted split rings out and no point in trying to get a Structural PE
> certify one (that's the manufacturers job). In desperation and squirming I
> appealed to the Forum in hopes I might find some loophole, no luck, LOL. I
> can't risk a building inspector making us tear out 1,500 supports on a
> "technicality". I think from a realistic POV the split rings would be OK
> supports for this application, no one will use them for Monkey Bars, but
> technically ...
>
> So we will use an FM approved ERICO EPB ring support less swivel nut which
> will let me get my 2" by using a QwikBolt or 1 1/2" lg. rod and HILTI and a
> hexnut/washer to snug it tight to the deck. Here is a business opportunity
> for someone to produce a Listed Split Ring, maybe from steel instead of
> malleable iron.
>
> I guess I will stop using Split Rings except for stand-off of vertical
> drops.
>
>
> Bill Minkel, Designer
> Member NFPA
> Western States F.P., Dallas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregg Fontes
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 1:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Split-Ring Hanger
>
> Bill,
>
> What was the condition that would make one decide to use a split ring?  Just
> curious.
>
> Thanks,
> Gregg Fontes
> Cen-Cal Fire Systems, Inc.
> (209)334-9119
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>


-- 
Ron Greenman
at home....
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to