I would agree as the gyration is reduced to where it is not as much a
concern.

R/
Matt

Matthew J. Willis
Living Water Fire Protection, LLC.
1160 McKenzie Rd.
PO Box 877
Cantonment, FL. 32533
850-937-1850 Voice
850-937-1852 Facsimile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

----- >-----Original Message-----
----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
----- >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
----- >Behalf Of Thom McMahon
----- >Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:20 AM
----- >To: [email protected]
----- >Subject: Re: NFPA 13 9.3
----- >
----- >1. When more Flex couplings than required are used, 
----- >additional Lateral Sway bracing shall be installed at 
----- >ever other extra coupling.
----- >2. When hanger rod shorter than 6" from top of pipe to 
----- >the point of attachment/structure are used lateral 
----- >bracing is not required.
----- >
----- >Our position has always been that if you use the short 
----- >rods, it doesn't matter how many flex couplings you 
----- >install Lateral bracing is still not required.
----- >Any other opinions?
----- >
----- >Thom McMahon
----- >Firetech, Inc.
----- >2560 Copper Ridge Dr
----- >Steamboat Springs, CO 80488-2136
----- >Tel: 970-879-7952
----- >Fax: 970-879-7926 
----- >
----- >_______________________________________________
----- >Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >[email protected]
----- >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >
----- >To Unsubscribe, send an email 
----- >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to