Eric,

Good point. In order to be accurate sufficient water must be flowed to
attain a 25% drop in pressure. (NFPA 291-4.3.6)

As a plan reviewer I've seen plenty of flat tests and back they go.
Wheres that stick.

John Drucker  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LONGMAN
Eric G (AREVA NP INC)
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

Joe,

Although I am fairly convinced of the correct answer to this issue, I
looked back through the NFPA Handbook (18th Ed.) and found an
interesting statement with respect to this issue... "It is not necessary
[in the example given in the text] nor should it become common practice,
to extrapolate much beyond the maximum flow point, because tests from
networks often produce supply curves that flatten out as the rate of
flow increases."  [Section 6 Chapter 7]

If you have plotted several test points that all lead to a straight
line, indicating an assurance of such an extrapolation out an additional
31 gpm, I would agree that 31 gpm would typically not be considered an
extreme extrapolation of this curve.  This can get back in to a
discussion of the absolute exactness of hydraulic calculations in the
first place, which has been hashed out on here previously.

Anyway, just my $0.02 on the subject.

Eric
 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Eric G. Longman
AREVA NP Inc.
Fort Worth, Texas

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Drucker
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

Joe,

Its appears as though you have more then enough water (then again you
already knew this). I didn't ask you about pressure because that can be
resolved with a fire pump.  I know other code officials who have
complained about some computer programs that don't draw the traditional
curve merely marking points with stars, I connect the dots, others
don't.

2002 NFPA-13 14.3.4 doesn't need any further explanation, the operative
term is "complete hydraulic calculation. So plot the curve from 0 to 0,
yea you read that correctly, draw a line down at 20 psi and shade the
area beyond 20 if you choose. 

15.1.2 Capacity, 15.2.1.2 Connections are the other applicable sections
of the standard.

If all else fails an appeal may be in order.

John Drucker
Fire Protection Subcode Official (AHJ)
Red Bank, NJ
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Burtell
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

About 2100 GPM.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Drucker
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

Joe,

What is GPM (Q) at 20psi residual (R20) on your supply curve ?

John

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Burtell
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

The AHJ is what George said, not allowing me to extrapolate beyond the
test point on the curve of 1210 gpm. Does anyone know of any sections in
NFPA that would hint that I can extrapolate beyond the 1210 gpm or
can't?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George
Church
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

I believe what Joe has encountered is an AHJ who doesn't realize what
EXTRAPOLATION on a water supply graph is.  Interpolating a point on a
curve is when the demand falls between your static and residual points;
extrapolation is when the demand is past the point where the residual
flow was measured. Chris is 100% right on the iffy-ness of a 300 GPM
flow extrapolated out to 1200. But 31 gpm past the measured point? I'd
ask the AHJ to cite code to indicate where you are wrong.

Probably time for a #13 committee member letter or an informal
interpretation. Or a day in hydraulics class for the AHJ?

glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

It most certainly does in the context of lowering the residuals to a
pressure less than your design pressure and providing more water at a
lower pressure that is then boosted to the pressure needed.  This is
what we (or at least I) though Joe's problem was at first, he was 31 gpm
on the wrong side of the curve.

Perhaps it was the way it was implied that confusion was created. Agreed
pump's don't create water but create AVAILABLE water (to a point) at a
desired pressure.

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.

763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390

Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

SNIP


And for others,  adding a pump does not create more water.   A pump will
not
add 31 gpm to the source.


Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ch2m.com


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY:
This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged and confidential, nor is it, unless specifically stated,
intended to be relied upon by any person or persons other than the
individual or entity named above and no warranties or representations
are made or intended to persons or entities not named above.  If the
reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by telephone, return this message to the address
above and delete all copies.  Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to