Tom,

Fortunately it was a small pump and the gauge in question was the one used
on the single hose monster. Fortunate our pump rep. had one in his van with
the calibration paperwork.

Why would I need to re-test when the calibration is not required by NFPA 20
(03)?

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

Ken if you're doing BFP testing you get your test sets calibrated each year,
you can send your gauges in at the same time. Personally we keep two sets
and that way we are never without one as they expire one month apart.
 Additionally if you run into this problem at test, I would offer to run the
test, then insert the gauge in an envelope addressed to the calibration co,
record the serial # of the gauge. (If it doesn't have one write one on it in
marker. Note that # on the test report. Offer to let the AHJ stick it in the
mail, and include a request that the AHJ be copied on the Calibration
report. When it comes back, if it's within 1% your test is complete, if not
you may have to re-test, which it sounds like you have to do anyway.

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Holsopple
(forum)
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 2:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Water Supply

Ok guys and gals.....here's one for ya.

Just did a pump acceptance test under 2003 edition of NFPA 20. The inspector
shows up on site and asks for calibrated gauges. Even though we pulled out a
gauge that came from the factory 3 months ago, he wanted to see the
paperwork. (I guess he didn't like the dirt that was on the gauge either
from a previous diesel pump flow test. Turns out things get muddy when you
do those) After reviewing NFPA 20 (03) I see that there is not a requirement
for gauge calibration except in the appendix, to which no tolerance for the
gauges is given. 

I questioned the inspector on the requirement and asked for a code
reference. What I got back was the re-write that appears in the 2007 edition
of the acceptance procedure that does note that gauges must be calibrated
and within +/- 1%. I'm fine with that, except for the fact that here in
Pennsyltucky and in his jurisdiction, the 2003 is the applicable standard.

Now to take it one step further, the new NFPA 20 (07) mentions that the
gauges must be calibrated annually (depending on use...kinda open ended
don't ya think?). In speaking with some folks that supplied our shiny 4 1/2"
Glycerine filled gauges, they mentioned that we could get them calibrated,
but "what are you gonna do, get them calibrated after every use?" They do
mention in the literature for our gauges (that I sent to the AHJ) that they
are calibrated at the factory. Keeping in mind that scientists are probably
using their "top of the line" gauges to measure the force of an atom
bouncing of a cow's butt.

I mentioned to the AHJ that in the meantime (till the 2007 ed comes around),
the township could purchase a calibrated gauge and use that as a benchmark
and throw the contractor's gauge(s) on a static point of the system if they
think something was tampered with.

I would be curious to see how others would handle this. AHJs especially.
You'ins keep my life interesting.

Getting calibrated gauge paperwork isn't a big deal (well it is if they
spring this on you at the time of test), but trying to enforce rules that
haven't been adopted yet kinda crosses the line in my book.

By the way, I did check out NFPA 291 (forgot the edition), there was mention
of calibration, but no mention of tolerance.

I have a headache from bouncing my head off the soapbox.

Ken Holsopple
Design Manager & Gauge Calibration Coordinator 
Rowe Sprinkler Systems 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.10/1584 - Release Date: 7/31/2008
12:00 PM



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to