Ed:

Per the Colorado cross connection Control Manual, any additive to potable
water supply for fire protection requires a RPZ. The CCCCM references the
1997 UPC Specifically 603.4.18.3 "Where anti-freeze, Corrosion inhibitors or
other chemicals are added to a fire protection system supplied from a
potable water supply, the potable water supply shall be protected by one of
the following: 1) RPZ assembly 2) RPZ/DC assembly"

Additionally from Appendix "D" of the CCCCM 1999, "Drain Flow Chart" It
notes that drains which are required for all RPZ devices can discharge based
upon operating pressure XX GPM and that drain sizes X" are able to accept
XXX GPM.

EXAMPLE: A 1" RPZ operating at a static pressure of 50PSI can discharge
approx. 65GPM. A 2" floor drain can only flow 55 GPM, and a 3" 112GPM, so
for a RPZ operating at 50PSI requires a 3" floor Drain.

Example 2:A2.5" RPZ operating at 100PSI requires a 6" floor drain capable of
450GPM, because at that pressure the RPZ could discharge up to 400 GPM and a
5" floor drain can only take 350GPM.

Please not specific discharge flows are available from some RPZ MFG.'s If
they are less you can use them.

Here's what the IPC 2006 says:
608.16.4 Connections to automatic fire sprinkler systems
and standpipe systems. The potable water supply to
automatic fire sprinkler and standpipe systems shall be protected
against backflow by a double check-valve assembly
or a reduced pressure principle backflow preventer.

608.16.4.1 Additives or non-potable source. Where
systems under continuous pressure contain chemical
additives or antifreeze, or where systems are connected
to a non-potable secondary water supply, the potable
water supply shall be protected against backflow by a
reduced pressure principle backflow preventer. Where
chemical additives or antifreeze are added to only a portion
of an automatic fire sprinkler or standpipe system,
the reduced pressure principle backflow preventer shall
be permitted to be located so as to isolate that portion of
the system.

 

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Kramer
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Backflow protection on antifreeze system

Anybody have a 2006 International Plumbing Code handy?

 

I have a client who wants to use glycerine in a small antifreeze system.
Nothing unusual about that.   But he claims that by using food-grade
glycerine he doesn't need an RP BFP and the associated expansion tank.  I
disagree,  but don't have code references to back it up.   The 2006 IPC is
applicable.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Ed Kramer

Kramer Design, LLC

Littleton, CO

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to