How is the PIPE obvious to the public so it does not fall under that requirement.. 13:26.2 is quite explicit. This is a common practice impacting all building systems and has been debated by NFPA TC's to the nth degree especially abandoned cabling in plenums.
Roland On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Tom Duross wrote: > You beat me to it Dave. I knew there was a 'false sense of > security' clause > on 1 somewhere. > I always thought it only meant heads, devices, etc. > Tom > > > NFPA 1 (2003, Edition) > 4.5.8.2 > Existing life safety features obvious to the public, if not required > by the > Code, shall be either maintained or removed. > > David Autry > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
