Craig, Does this client have a problem with air compressors? I guess if you don't want to maintain supervisory air on the system then you could eliminate the air compressor. But that would be a noncompliant way of doing the system.This would then be a non-interlocked system no better than a simple dry pipe system.But then again,a dry pipe system requires an air supply.So see my original question.
Lamar Vaughn,SET ---- [email protected] wrote: > Can someone provide commentary on the wording relating to "...air that might > not be under pressure..."? > > The client wishes to eliminate air compressors based on this wording. > > > NFPA 13, 2010 > 3.4.9* Preaction Sprinkler System. A sprinkler system employing automatic > sprinklers > that are attached to a piping system that contains air that might or might > not be under > pressure, with a supplemental detection system installed in the same areas as > the sprinklers > > Craig L. Prahl, CET > Fire Protection Specialist > Mechanical Department > CH2MHILL > Lockwood Greene > 1500 International Drive > Spartanburg, SCĀ 29304-0491 > Direct - 864.599.4102 > Fax - 864.599.8439 > [email protected] > http://www.ch2m.com > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
