Craig,
 Does this client have a problem with air compressors? I guess if you don't 
want to maintain supervisory air on the system then you could eliminate the air 
compressor. But that would be a noncompliant way of doing the system.This would 
then be a non-interlocked system no better than a simple dry pipe system.But 
then again,a dry pipe system requires an air supply.So see my original question.

Lamar Vaughn,SET

 
---- [email protected] wrote: 
> Can someone provide commentary on the wording relating to "...air that might 
> not be under pressure..."?
> 
> The client wishes to eliminate air compressors based on this wording.
> 
> 
> NFPA 13, 2010
> 3.4.9* Preaction Sprinkler System. A sprinkler system employing automatic 
> sprinklers
> that are attached to a piping system that contains air that might or might 
> not be under
> pressure, with a supplemental detection system installed in the same areas as 
> the sprinklers
> 
> Craig L. Prahl, CET   
> Fire Protection Specialist
> Mechanical Department
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SCĀ  29304-0491
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> [email protected]
> http://www.ch2m.com 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to