NFPA #13 (2002) / 7.3.2.3.2 requires supervisory air pressure on ALL preaction 
systems (Min. 7 psi).


---- "Fletcher wrote: 
> So is a single interlock electric release pre-action system without 
> supervision air allowed by NFPA #13?
> 
> Ron Fletcher
> Aero Automatic
> Phoenix, AZ
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: non-supervised preaction
> 
> In DIPA the piping is still supervised even if you have electric release 
> which would be by HD or SD's as opposed to pneumatic release with pilot 
> sprinklers.
> 
> Craig L. Prahl, CET   
> Fire Protection Specialist
> Mechanical Department
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> [email protected]
> http://www.ch2m.com 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: non-supervised preaction
> 
> Would this in effect be a double interlock pre action system if the 
> pre-action valve was controlled electronically? The system would need both 
> the detectors to activate and release the pre-action valve, and one of the 
> sprinkler elements to fuse before water was released?
> 
> Am I picturing the set up correctly? 
> 
> It seems like the main issue would be that you could not get a trouble signal 
> at the panel when one of the heads opened (or if the piping was damaged) if 
> there was no pressure change to activate a switch.
> 
> They could always use nitrogen if they are opposed to air compressors.
> 
> Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP 
> Sales Engineer 
> Alliance Fire Protection 
> *Licensed in KS & MO 
> 
> 913.888.0647 ph 
> 913.888.0618 f 
> 913.927.0222 cell 
> www. AFPsprink.com 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:55 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: non-supervised preaction
> 
> Craig,
>  Does this client have a problem with air compressors? I guess if you don't 
> want to maintain supervisory air on the system then you could eliminate the 
> air compressor. But that would be a noncompliant way of doing the system.This 
> would then be a non-interlocked system no better than a simple dry pipe 
> system.But then again,a dry pipe system requires an air supply.So see my 
> original question.
> 
> Lamar Vaughn,SET
> 
>  
> ---- [email protected] wrote: 
> > Can someone provide commentary on the wording relating to "...air that 
> > might not be under pressure..."?
> > 
> > The client wishes to eliminate air compressors based on this wording.
> > 
> > 
> > NFPA 13, 2010
> > 3.4.9* Preaction Sprinkler System. A sprinkler system employing automatic 
> > sprinklers
> > that are attached to a piping system that contains air that might or might 
> > not be under
> > pressure, with a supplemental detection system installed in the same areas 
> > as the sprinklers
> > 
> > Craig L. Prahl, CET   
> > Fire Protection Specialist
> > Mechanical Department
> > CH2MHILL
> > Lockwood Greene
> > 1500 International Drive
> > Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
> > Direct - 864.599.4102
> > Fax - 864.599.8439
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.ch2m.com 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> > 
> > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to