Uhhh... thanks DJJ8389? Me? If someone whom has spent years trying to wring
the magic out of NFPA 13 Hydraulic Calculations is a genius, then so be it
:) 

I wanted to add something important about K that struck me just recently: in
looking at Q, K, and P, and knowing g = 32.2 ft/sec2, K is seen to be unique
in that it is the only 'timeless' quantity of the bunch!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 7:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: K-Factor

Wow. You are a genius.
 
 
In a message dated 5/5/2013 12:46:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

cubic  feet per second, divided by square feet, equals feet per second.
Q is (ft x  ft x ft) / second.
K is ft x ft.
P is (ft/sec x ft/sec, divided by  64.4)*, times .433.
This is IDEAL. Play pipes are ~98% ideal. Some hydrant  butts are ~80% 
ideal.

* h=(v2/2g) is as per Evangelista Torricelli,  years before Bernoulli. 
Newton
used the experimental results of this, later  called 'The Law of Falling
Bodies', as one of the verifications of his  Gravitational Constant. So if
someone asked me "What is K-Factor?", I would  say "It is the constant area
acted upon by constant gravity around which  Flow and Pressure vary".

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron  Greenman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 6:13  PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re:  K-Factor

I would define it as a number representing a fixed and  repeating set of
circumstances in a closed system (numerically closed) that  would otherwise
be variable. For instance the K in the formulae Q=KP^0.5  represents the
29.83cd^2 when those factors are consistent. Hence with a  sprinkler head,
which has a known co-efficient and diameter, you can reduce  those factors
to a single number. That would apply to a branchline also  wherein you can
reduce the entire Q-P relationship to one big hole. You can  use this again
and again as long as the pieces that made up the original  batch of
calculations are exactly repeated. Saves you from having to  calculate the
same relationship over and over. calculation shorthand. I was  in the middle
of the last sentence an hour and a half ago, before Vince and  Cecil
responded. But here's my explanation of the same thing with  different
words.


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Fairchild, Jack  
<[email protected]
> wrote:

> Here's a Friday  question that was asked of me:  What's a K-Factor?
>
> The  Brock Hydraulics book states it is the discharge coefficient, but I
>  can't find it in NFPA 13.  Am I missing it?
>
> Jack  Fairchild
> _______________________________________________
>  Sprinklerforum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>



--  
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering  Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA  98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700  (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS,  WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their  vocations. -Francis Bacon,
essayist, philosopher, and statesman  (1561-1626)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum  mailing  list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum  mailing  list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to