I'll be the heckler saying "we should give a little more thought to comb conc 
spaces as far as Density over Area goes, because we need the same GPM for  
two-foot six tall spaces as we do for twenty-foot six tall spaces- I don't 
believe it.

> On May 19, 2014, at 10:41 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'll sit thru a 3rd time Monday getting schooled by you Mr Baggins (the first 
> two times span plus or minus 15 years), but come Tuesday I'll learn you, K?
> 
>> On May 19, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thank you Bob, may I have another?......
>> 
>> Cute, Steve.  
>> Look for our new website: Sprinklapedia.com  (Pete is co-owner)
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Cecil sprinklageek. truly.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Subject: RE: TIA 13-2
>>> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:25:25 -0700
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>> 
>>> After consulting my Fire Sprinkler Encecilclopedia, I have learned that
>>> the scope of the TIA is only to replace the word "plastic" with
>>> "nonmetallic" throughout the materials standards.  
>>> 
>>> SML
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Pete Schwab [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:05 PM
>>> To: Steve Leyton; [email protected]
>>> Subject: RE: TIA 13-2
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> I am not sure of what the changes are and frankly I cannot remember
>>> voting on this as an SSI member.
>>> I will definitely be looking at this when I get in the office tomorrow.
>>> Pete
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Sprinklerforum [[email protected]] on
>>> behalf of Steve Leyton [[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:29 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: RE: TIA 13-2
>>> 
>>> Can anyone out there explain why TIA 13-2 was issued?  Without reading
>>> it line-by-line, whatever revisions it contains seem pretty subtle.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Steve Leyton
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
>>> .org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to