Well I misspoke due to QR reduction possibilities but you know what I mean. 
Just the sheer volume of water in both the liquid and vapor state in the hot 
upper layer can do the trick.

> On May 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'll be the heckler saying "we should give a little more thought to comb conc 
> spaces as far as Density over Area goes, because we need the same GPM for  
> two-foot six tall spaces as we do for twenty-foot six tall spaces- I don't 
> believe it.
> 
>> On May 19, 2014, at 10:41 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'll sit thru a 3rd time Monday getting schooled by you Mr Baggins (the 
>> first two times span plus or minus 15 years), but come Tuesday I'll learn 
>> you, K?
>> 
>>> On May 19, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you Bob, may I have another?......
>>> 
>>> Cute, Steve.  
>>> Look for our new website: Sprinklapedia.com  (Pete is co-owner)
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Cecil sprinklageek. truly.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Subject: RE: TIA 13-2
>>>> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:25:25 -0700
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> After consulting my Fire Sprinkler Encecilclopedia, I have learned that
>>>> the scope of the TIA is only to replace the word "plastic" with
>>>> "nonmetallic" throughout the materials standards.  
>>>> 
>>>> SML
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Pete Schwab [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:05 PM
>>>> To: Steve Leyton; [email protected]
>>>> Subject: RE: TIA 13-2
>>>> 
>>>> Steve
>>>> I am not sure of what the changes are and frankly I cannot remember
>>>> voting on this as an SSI member.
>>>> I will definitely be looking at this when I get in the office tomorrow.
>>>> Pete
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Sprinklerforum [[email protected]] on
>>>> behalf of Steve Leyton [[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:29 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: RE: TIA 13-2
>>>> 
>>>> Can anyone out there explain why TIA 13-2 was issued?  Without reading
>>>> it line-by-line, whatever revisions it contains seem pretty subtle.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Steve Leyton
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
>>>> .org
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to